aiapps365

Conva vs Fireflies.ai

Fireflies.ai records and transcribes across the broadest set of platforms of any tool in this comparison set, then layers AI summaries, search, and conversation-intelligence analytics on top — priced with both a seat fee and a separate AI-credit allowance. Conva skips the recording-and-analyze-later model entirely: it suggests what to say while you're still on the call.

The clearest practical difference, beyond live vs. after-the-fact help, is the billing model — Conva's local processing means no published call-length cap, while Fireflies gates its AI features with a separate credit meter on top of the seat price.

At a glance

Conva

Real-time call co-pilot for sales reps — dual-channel live transcription and AI-suggested replies with document citations, processed locally on your desktop.

Pricing: Free (invite-only beta)

Best for: Sales reps and teams who want live, in-call talking-point help during calls they're already taking themselves — not a business looking for something to answer its phone.

Fireflies.ai

Meeting recorder and AI notetaker with the most credit-metered pricing structure of the three notetakers compared here.

Pricing: Free ($18/user/mo Pro)

Best for: Teams that record a high volume of calls across many platforms and want conversation-intelligence analytics, and are comfortable managing a separate AI-credit allowance alongside the seat price.

Feature comparison

"Not published" means the vendor doesn't document it — we don't guess. Verified 2026-09-03.

FeatureConvaFireflies.ai
CRM / back-office integrationsNot publishedNo integrations published as of 2026-09-03PartialBroad video-platform integrations; CRM sync varies by plan, not fully published
Call analytics dashboardPartialSearchable call recordings and transcripts; no aggregate reporting/metrics dashboard publishedNot published
Self-serve signupFree beta signup by email — nothing to configure, open the app and join a callFree tier available
Live AI assistance while the call is happeningAI-suggested replies compose while the call is still happening, not after it endsAI summaries and analysis are generated after capture, not suggested live
On-device / local audio processingPartialAudio capture and transcription run locally via an offline model; the AI-suggested-replies feature is a separate opt-in cloud path (bring your own API key)Cloud transcription and processing
Bring-your-own API keyBring-your-own API key for the cloud speech/LLM engines that power AI-suggested repliesNo bring-your-own API key option published
Unlimited call lengthNo published cap on call length, since core processing runs on-deviceAI-credit limits (e.g. 30 AI credits/mo on Business) gate usage separately from the seat price
AI answers cite their sourceAI-suggested replies cite the specific document/passage they're drawn fromNot published
Dual-channel speaker separationRep and caller kept on separate channels, not one blended transcript feedNot publishedNot published

Live assistance vs recorded analytics

Fireflies' strength is depth after the fact: conversation intelligence, team analytics, and search across a large meeting history on its Business tier. None of that helps you mid-call. Conva's entire premise is the opposite — a cited, grounded suggestion appears while you're talking, with no analytics layer to speak of yet.

Pricing structure and limits

Fireflies charges a seat fee (Pro $18/mo, Business $29/mo) plus a separate AI-credit allowance that gates how much of the AI summary/analysis feature you can use — two numbers to track, not one. Conva is free during its current beta with no announced post-beta price; its core transcription has no published usage cap since it runs on-device rather than metering cloud minutes or credits.

Where each is more mature

Fireflies has the broader platform coverage, a real free tier, and volume discounts for large teams — genuine strengths if you need to record and search a high volume of calls across many tools. Conva has no CRM integrations published and is still invite-only, with pricing not yet announced at all.

Verdict

Conva

Choose Conva if what you need is help composing what to say while a call is happening, not analytics after the fact, and you'd rather avoid a two-part seat-plus-credit pricing structure.

Fireflies.ai

Choose Fireflies.ai if you record a high volume of calls across many platforms and want conversation-intelligence analytics and team-wide search, and you're comfortable managing a seat fee plus a separate AI-credit allowance.

Frequently asked questions

Does Fireflies help during the call, or only after?
Only after. Fireflies records and transcribes live, but its AI summaries, search, and analytics are generated once the call ends — the same after-the-fact model as Granola and Otter.
How is Conva's pricing different from Fireflies' credit system?
Fireflies combines a monthly seat fee with a separate AI-credit allowance that limits AI-feature usage. Conva's core transcription runs on-device with no published usage cap; it's free during its current beta with no post-beta price announced yet.
Is this comparison independent?
This site is published by Avant-Garde Global LLC, which also makes AIRIN (an unrelated AI receptionist product) and is not affiliated with Conva or Fireflies.ai. Conva is included in this guide's directory as a tool we cover, not one we sell.

Sources